煤炭工程 ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (2): 28-31.doi: 10.11799/ce201902007

• 施工技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

官地矿切顶卸压沿空留巷聚能爆破现场试验研究

杨军,王世彬,马小燕,等   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学(北京)力学与建筑工程学院
    2. 中国矿业大学
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-13 修回日期:2018-10-26 出版日期:2019-02-20 发布日期:2019-03-19
  • 通讯作者: 王世彬 E-mail:1512636634@qq.com

Experimental research on blasting parameters of roof cutting and pressure relief gob side entry retaining in Guandi coal mine

  • Received:2018-09-13 Revised:2018-10-26 Online:2019-02-20 Published:2019-03-19

摘要: 为了确定110工法的合理爆破参数并实现安全沿空留巷的目的,以官地矿中厚煤层12605工作面为研究背景,采用理论分析和现场研究相结合的方法,对比分析了三种不同装药结构条件下的试验爆破效果。结果表明,在爆破孔深7m、炮孔间距500mm的情况下,由孔顶到孔底依次为“4+3+2+1”装药方式对顶板破坏严重,“3+2+2+1”的装药方式切缝效果较差。而采用“3+3+2+1”的装药方式,爆破孔内裂缝明显发育,裂缝率达到87%。满足留巷设计要求,现场应用效果良好。

关键词: 切顶卸压, 沿空留巷, 聚能爆破, 110工法

Abstract: Shaped blasting plays an important role in roof cutting and pressure relief along goaf retaining roadway. In order to explore reasonable blasting parameters of 110 mining methods and achieve the goal of successful and safe retaining roadway, taking the medium-thick seam 12605 working face of Guandi Coal Mine as the research background, three different charging structures were compared and analyzed by means of theoretical analysis and field research. The test blasting effect under the condition. The results show that under the condition of 7 m blasting hole depth and 500 mm blasting hole spacing, 4+3+2+1 charge from the top of hole to the bottom of hole destroys the roof seriously, and 3+2+2+1 charge slitting effect is poor. With the 3+3+2+1 charging method, the cracks in the blasting hole develop obviously, and the crack rate reaches 87%. Satisfying the design requirements of retaining roadway, the field application effect is good.

中图分类号: